Totally agree with you it is sick, the poor kid is obviously brainwashed

Yep, in fact he’s done MORE for gun owners than the Republican’s will admit!

Obviously brainwashing starts early in his house- sad to see kids being used like that.

Well as a Republican I can tell you that I will be voting for Obama. I have such disgust for the eejits that have taken over a once great party. I am appalled by the chosen candidate and the antics that regularly occur in the congress that I feel sorry for Obama. I think he is trying his best and should get another 4 years.

Has to be racism. That’s the obvious subtext behind the birther bullshit, too.

Fox news is a joke.
They are that bad, they cannot legally operate in Canada where they wanted to set-up.
* Canada has a law that states anything that is news, MUST be accurate and TRUE – and thats the law.
Fox pressurised politicians in Canada to have that repealed so their could then set-up there.
They were told where to go!

Fox news – I wouldn’t piss on them if they were on fire!

Typo errors…

Such is the outright lies of the Republicans that they are stating Obama is now also giving away islands of America!
They are – seriously!
But hang on… Obama is not!!!

Shades of Hitler Youth there

This is the intellectual dishonesty of the ultimate kind to suggest that anyone who opposes Obama’s policy is a racist. Grow up, get some logic and reason under that stupid hat.

Did you even watch the video Dom? It’s just lies and right wing rubbish. I’m anti-Obama too, he said he’d close Guantanamo, end the war in Afghanistan, etc,. But didn’t. I think my point want wooshing over your head.

Dom – it’s reverse racism. Race is not an issue for reasonable people, it is the last accusation of the intellectually stunted. You and I see a failed leader, Martin sees a black man.

I’m so intellectually stunted you’re the one who missed the point :) You did get the irony? Where that post is not my own opinion but the opinion of the knuckle dragger parents of that child?

Martin. The child was never disrespectful of the person he called “Mr Obama”. And in your bright mind the child was on his way to making point number 11, don’t vote for Obama “because he’s black”.
If you think the logical progression of such a mild presentation as the one above is racism, you are demonstrating (a) your own bigotry toward American republicans, by assuming they are racist when zero evidence exists to demonstrate any such thing and (b) your own racism toward a black man, as ypu cannot conceive that people not like you might reject a black man because he is incompetent, not because he is black.
Take a good look at Obama, Martin. He’s the worst president in US history. Is he black? Seems to me it’s only people like you who care about his skin colour.

The worst president in US history? Please explain to me how Obama is worse than William Henry Harrison or Andrew Johnson.

Nick – get real, as the yanks say. My comment re Obama being worst president in history was, naturally, subjective. He’s the first leader to bankrupt America financially and morally. You disagree? So what? I stand over my claim

Bankrupt America morally? Ridiculous. He’s the first president to grant serious human rights for the LGBT community, a strong moral victory. And the first several presidents owned slaves. You seem to have a VERY limited moral perspective.

As for bankrupting financially, you’d have to look to most presidents since Reagan for that. The Republican party used to believe in cutting government spending – now they seem to think it’s a firesale and they can’t spend fast enough. Both parties are guilty of this.

You seem very uneducated in American history.

Just as I said, Nick
Morally bankrupt

Is that why ireland sends its sick kids to america for treatment. The healtcare in Ireland is at third world standards.Limit the ammount of money people get on unemployment,they will soon find a job.Ireland is a complete joke of a country, and to hear the anti american bile coming from the lib left on here.It would’nt suprise me if it turned out to be that slob micheal moore was behind the camera.Its the sort of crap that he likes to get up to around election time.Obama had his day and he failed,time to let some on else have a go..

Of course. He will be a liberal while he is young, inexperienced and emotional. Later when he matures, gains experience, confidence and knowledge he will become a conservative. Unless he remains immature and emotional in his mature age in which case he will remain a liberal.

Because it demonstrates the power of indoctrination. This kid will grow into a right wing half wit supporting numerous imperialistic wars and supporting domestic policies impoverishing working and middle class people.

Why would you red thumb abortion sure it’s great!

I didn’t see hate displayed. The child even called the first couple “Mr & Mrs Obama”. It seems most contributors on this page can tolerate any opinion as long as it doesn’t clash with their own

Yes, I can understand being frustrated when someone debunks your use of Lifenews as an impartial academic source. It’s hard having to argue using facts, isn’t it!

Thumbs up, I said!!

He has two kids, who I don’t think I’ve heard him describe as burdens, but thanks for playing!

Yes Annie that’s why he had two.

@ Annie

Your going to come back of course with a link proving this!
…O’ wait, he never said it or espoused it! DOH!

Annie – When the little one is not wanted, it’s a “foetus”, which is a “burden”, when it’s wanted, it’s a “baby”.
It’s easier to dispose of a foetus than a baby, you see

I don’t live in America and I don’t know a single American who would vote for Romney. When will people realise that “anacedotal experience of people just like me” is not really authoritative?

Yes, Life News is obviously a strongly unbiased source.

In fact, he has always talked about abortion in terms of trusting women and their families to make the best decisions for them, not that he finds children to be a burden. I would say the actions to judge by are the fact that his an active father of his children, but I know the idea of trusting people to make their own decisions is a foreign concept to you!

You don’t get sarcasm and irony, Annie? Abortionists call babies “foetus”, obstetricians call babies “baby”.
I call babies “babies” because thats what they are and what we all were. Saves any confusion about the subject.
Can you imagine an abortionist reassuring a mother “it’s ok, now, we’ll have your baby out and dead in a short time”. They would in their eye talk like that.

Well, no, actually. In life, we develop. First we’re an embryo, then a foetus, then a baby, then a toddler and so on. If not, why not just call a baby a pensioner? Saves confusion, right?

And you wonder why people believe those who are anti-choice have a poor grasp of embryology…

That’s making a LOT of generalisations. It’s interesting that you believe a foetus isn’t human, but a baby is? Hmm, sounds like you recognise the grey area of development milestones. I’m assuming you’ve never had an abortion, but plenty of people who have been pregnant and are familiar with embryology see a clear developmental distinction between an early term embryo and a late term foetus.

Regardless, plenty of women who have abortions see it as a baby. Just because you believe it’s a human doesn’t mean you consent to have it live off your womb/blood/nutrients. But as a man, you will never have the lived experience of a pregnancy to understand this.

Nick
“It’s interesting that you believe a foetus isn’t human, but a baby is?
Hmm, sounds like you recognise the grey area of development milestones”
Put words in my mouth, why don’t you? Is that your way of “winning” an
argument?
I’d say to every reader of this exchange my views are obvious – except to
Nick.
I don’t really care if you manipulate my words to win an argument that only
occurs in your head. I am trying to put across a point of view that will
change people’s minds. Obviously your mind is so closed (or limited. Same
thing, I suppose) that you don’t recognise that there can actually be an
opposing view to yuor own, and in true arrogant liberal fashion you publish
your mighty assumption as follows: “And you wonder why people believe those who are anti-choice have a poor grasp of embryology…”
You aren’t going to be much of a success on the school debating team, Nick, when your leaps of logic produce 2 gems such as those from you that I have reproduced here.