If thats offensive then we may as well say goodbye to comedy.

Have people gone completely mad? How come it’s completely acceptable to say and do multiple taboo/racist acts on stage as a comedian or ventriloquist while an actor can not openly act in an advertisement campaign?? It’s clear from the majority who have voted above that it’s not offensive….so why entertain a small minority of moaners??

FFS. The only thing offensive about it is his woeful acting!

Would it be sexist if he dragged up as a woman?

In my view its not offensive but he is not ripping the p#ss out of me. Give me a rep of Cork accent booooooyyyyyy & maybe he will offend me but most of my Dublin bleedin buddies do that anyway so I doubt it.

Its offensively crap.

Its only racist because he is white.

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries.

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I want the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I say that, I’m a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Not offensive at all !!!

The Americans love using Indian people in comedy. One of the first was prob Van Wilder, and it continues with That seventies show and the big bang theory. I think its because the way they are portrayed is diametrically opposed to what people expect of Indian folk, as they are perceived as conservative. Maybe the Indians are fed up with people making a living out of using them for cheap gags? I dont think it was that offensive but maybe the Indian people are tiring of it? Its not exactly very clever comedy anyhow.

His hippy character *is* Peter Andre with dreads!

Personally, I’m not offended by it. But if the article says that a number of complainants of Indian origin found it so, then you’d have to say that it was offensive to that group. It’s easy enough for me as a white Irish person to say I don’t see it as offensive but I’m not the one who matters here. If a group felt that they were targeted unfairly, even by clumsy accident then it’s simply good manners to apologise and remove the ad. Simples.

We have had to put up with americans pretending to be irish for years and have had to put up with brutal irish accents in films and yet we never cried racism!!

“Because of history” does not justify White genocide.
“For the economy” does not justify White genocide.
“Low birth rates” does not justify White genocide.
“We all bleed red!” does not justify White genocide.
“We are all human!” does not justify White genocide.
“Race is just a social construct!” does not justify White genocide.
“We are all from Africa!” does not justify White genocide.

Meanwhile, no one is flooding Africa with Non Africans and telling them… “we all bleed red” …we are going to create a blended humanity in ONLY Africa.
No one is flooding Japan with non-Japanese and telling them… “we all bleed red” …we are going to create a blended humanity in ONLY Japan.
Only White countries are doing this, only anti-Whites like you are pushing it. It is genocide.

Anti-racist is just a codeword for anti-White.

In my opinion, not offensive, certainly not intended to be.

If he did a ridiculously badly stereotyped Irishman I wouldn’t find it offensive either, cringy perhaps, but not offensive. It’s clear that it’s not supposed to be a realistic representation of any nationality.

Perhaps these complaints are simply because some people aren’t familiar with how the English speaking country cultures view this sort of parody, there may be a fear that we try to see Indians like the poorly acted character in this video. I can understand it from this angle, I can only assure those that are complaining that we certainly don’t see Indians this way, it’s an over the top stereotype, he’s about as Indian as how much an oversized guinness swilling red haired Leprechaun called Seamus who greets everyone with ‘Top o the mornin to ya!’ is Irish.

“Its only racist because he is white.” Those poor oppressed crackers not being allowed to black up and poke fun at brown people, what’s the world coming to eh Diego? Tango whiskey alpha tango…that is all….

I have a question for the anti-White academics:

“African-American studies” celebrates blacks

“Asian-American studies” celebrates asians

“Chicano studies” celebrates hispanics

“Whiteness studies” denies that White people even EXIST, and that these White people (who don’t exist) have unearned “White privilege”

Here is my question:

Who do you think you are kidding anti-Whites?

“Anti-racism” is just a code word for anti-WHITE

Wow surprising to see the notorious Tim Wise posting Mantra. Why the change of heart Tim? Maybe you realized that ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are flooded with massive 3rd World immigration to the detriment of the indigenous White populations?
In 50 years there will be NO majority White countries on earth. Yet Africa has over 50+ all black nations. Asia will remain totally Asian. And that will be true a century from now. It is White countries and ONLY White countries that are being flooded with non-Whites and it is EVERY single White country.

Whites will have gone from almost 30% of the world population in 1900 to approximately 2-3% by the year 2100, per the UN. This is what genocide looks like, educate yourself. When the Chinese try and force assimilate Tibet, it is rightly called genocide. Genocide does not require lining people up and killing them.
If Africa was undergoing forced assimilation and massive immigration of non-blacks, against the wishes of most Africans, to the point that every single African country would be non-black by midcentury – well we would know it was genocide.
Diversity is White GENOCIDE and anti-racist is just a CODEWORD for anti-White.

comments removed on what basis?

Zorkozy says the only way Europeans will “survive” is to miscegenate with hundreds of millions of non-Whites. That’s backwards. Are you anti-Whites honestly telling me the only way the Japanese people can survive is by miscegenating with tens of millions of Africans? Isn’t it actually a logical fact that the opposite is true? Isn’t it also a fact from ALL the evidence, that ALL self proclaimed “anti-racists” support this mass 3rd world immigration and “assimilation” for EVERY and ONLY White countries? Does not what YOU anti-Whites advocate result in the ongoing program of White geNOcide? Then what kind of psycho does not believe that ‘anti-racist is just a code for anti-White’?