The Daily Edge uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Diplomatic wrangling over US embassy’s cat problem in Kabul

The US embassy in Afghanistan is home to up to 30 feral cats – and diplomats are at odds over how to deal with them.

Feral cats like these have been causing a diplomatic headache for the US's new ambassador in Afghanistan.
Feral cats like these have been causing a diplomatic headache for the US's new ambassador in Afghanistan.
Image: Salim Virji via Flickr

THE UNITED STATES’ new ambassador to Afghanistan is meeting with some unusual diplomatic problems in his first days on the job – over the unlikeliest of issues.

The Washington Post reports that a self-formed ‘cat committee’ is opposing plans to exterminate between 25 and 30 rabid, feral cats which have made the embassy in Kabul their home – causing some internal conflict among Ryan Crocker’s already tightly-wound staff.

Staff in the embassy already work under tense conditions – walled off from the rest of the city, under constant heavy security. As Joshua Partlow writes, even the name of the embassy’s bar points to the fraught atmosphere: it is called the Duck and Cover.

As a result, some see the cats as a nice, homely touch – including the so-called “cat committee”, which one diplomat noted was “full of cat ladies” – but others want rid of the felines, which have a history of attacking staff who approach them too closely.

Proposals allowing the staff to ‘adopt’ some cats, or have them brought back to the US for repatriation, also hit a stone wall – when it emerged that while the cats were a health nuisance, they were also helping to keep out poisonous vermin.

Read the full report at the Washington Post >

Read next:

Comments (5 Comments)

  • Do they really all carry rabies – ‘cos if they do they’ll be dead in about 2 months anyway If so, they are unlikely to attack people, and far more likely to keep other more aggressive species under control. If not (and maybe even so), trap, neuter, vaccinate and release, problem solved. No new cats are born, no room for other cats in the territory until the existing ones die of old age/incident so numbers are capped, vermin are kept under control and there’s a huge reduction in fighting and spraying. The US alone (never mind the rest of the world) is full of charities that offer this service free or subsidised to tens of thousands, I can’t believe they wouldn’t pony up the dosh to offer a humane compromise for 30 cats.

    Reply
  • i think they should just pet them..

    Reply
  • John 04/08/11 #

    Steve, isn’t it already over-run with vermin. Think about it ;-)

    Reply
  • John,what a thoroughly disgusting and ill-informed comment as without the cats the place would be overrun by vermin.

    Reply

Add New Comment