The Daily Edge uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 17 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Cancer survivors launch campaign for a ‘bald Barbie’ doll

A Facebook campaign asking Mattel to manufacturer a Barbie undergoing cancer treatment is gaining worldwide steam.

Cutting the hair off a Barbie doll isn't enough for some people - who want Mattel to manufacture a Barbie doll recovering from cancer treatment.
Cutting the hair off a Barbie doll isn't enough for some people - who want Mattel to manufacture a Barbie doll recovering from cancer treatment.
Image: Facebook

BARBIE HAS BEEN an astronaut, an architect, a Nascar driver, and a news anchor. Now, there’s an online movement to get her to attempt what could be her biggest feat yet: going bald to fight cancer.

A Facebook page titled ‘Beautiful and Bald Barbie! Let’s see if we can get it made’ was started a few days before Christmas. By this afternoon, the page had more than 15,000 fans.

The goal is to get toy maker Mattel to create a bald Barbie in support of children with cancer.

Friends Rebecca Sypin and Jane Bingham, who live on opposite coasts but have both been affected by the disease, hatched the idea for the social media movement because Barbie is an influential children’s toy.

Bingham has lost her hair due to chemotherapy treatments to treat lymphoma. Sypin’s 12-year-old daughter, Kin Inich, also lost her hair this year in her own battle to treat leukaemia.

Mattel didn’t return calls seeking comment, but the women said they have contacted the company through some general form letters. In return, they said, they’ve received form letters that say Mattel doesn’t accept ideas from outside sources.

The women say a bald Barbie would provide a huge platform to raise awareness for children with cancer.

11-inch legend

Barbie – all 11.5 inches of her – is one of the best-known toys of all time. She can sell for $10 at Wal-Mart or $7,000 on eBay.

She’s taken on all sorts of incarnations throughout her nearly 53 years of existence, crushing stereotypes and showing little girls that they can be whatever they want to be.

There’s been an elegant Grace Kelly Barbie; a Barbie in thigh-high pink boots; a tattooed Barbie; a pregnant Barbie friend, and another Barbie friend in a wheelchair.

But Barbie has also been dissed for not being as socially responsible as she could be. She’s best known for her curves, which long have sparked complaints by women’s groups that say she imposes an unachievable physical standard on young girls. She was also lambasted when a talking version uttered an exclamation about math class being hard.

The friends who started the ‘Beautiful and Bald Barbie’ movement aren’t natural activists. Sypin, 32, is a special needs assistant; Bingham, 41, is a photographer.

“We’re not demanding that the company do anything,” Sypin said. “We’re just hoping somebody sees this and can help us make it happen.”

Overall, Sypin said she’s been pleased with the response to the Facebook page. One fan of the Facebook page wrote of Mattel: “If they are making dolls that are inspiring young girls with careers then why not make a doll that would inspire young girls who are dealing with cancer.”

One step further?

Some commenters suggested the friends take the movement further and extend it to boys. So, over the weekend, they started an accompanying Facebook page, “Bald G.I. Joe Movement.” Hasbro, the maker of G.I. Joe, didn’t immediately return a call for comment.

The movement has its critics, too. Some people have told the women to just take a normal Barbie and shave her hair off to make the same point.

Bingham posted photos where she did just that — resulting in patchy, unattractive clumps on Barbie’s head. She also posted digitally doctored pictures of a bald Barbie to show how beautiful the doll could be.

And to people who say that it makes more sense to just donate to cancer research rather than to buy a bald Barbie?

“A lot of these people wouldn’t have even thought about doing that without this movement,” Bingham said.

- Christina Rexrode

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (30 Comments)

  • Ah christ, i had two family members with the big C and i still think this is most stupid thing ive ever heard. Children still need a certain amount of innocence….what next HIV Bardie and Crystal Meth Ken. Its a Bloody toy!!! For children!!! Get a grip.

    Reply
  • I’m all for supporting people who are suffering or recovering from cancer. I’ve lost people to it the same as most people have I think. But a cancer surviving barbie? I can’t see that happening… Isn’t barbie supposed to be what a little girl wants to be when she grows up?a sexy professional or something? No one WANTS to deal with cancer. In one way I do get the women’s point, but in another way I have to say,I don’t think I would be rushing to buy that for the little girls in my life….. Am I really wrong? Another perspective that might change my mind would be welcomed here cause I can’t tell if I’m being very ignorant or not

    Reply
  • All for raising cancer awareness but let the children have their childhood for as long as possible.
    Also predominantly why should only little girls be cancer aware? I wonder would a bald batman and robin take off?

    Reply
  • I guess it’s a slightly touchy subject to have an opinion on and I respect everyone.. but (Theres the but!) I don’t think it’s a very clever idea.
    Not from a ‘company’ standpoint anyway.

    Barbie sells dolls to kids.. kids who don’t know or even care what cancer is (Hopefully thats the case for most if not all kids) Because it’s truly the only time in your life with the chance to be purely innocent.. so why waste it? Kids are getting older faster all the time, don’t make childhood from 3-4 and adulthood from 4+

    On the original point (Company standpoint) they won’t sell.. Well not very many. Noone wants to have to deal with cancer. Noone I know anyway.

    Reply
  • I was going to say something terrible but I won’t, come on thumbs down where are you ????

    Reply
  • Have a bald Barbie by all means but by having having the Barbie with cancer takes the idea of what Barbie is about . Little girls- and boys – play and fantasise about being Barbie . I think it’s a bad idea . We do underestimate what children can understand. So it’s not for that reason I’m against it .

    Reply
  • Whats next an action man with one testicle?
    Ridiculous idea

    Reply
  • Cancer takes so much as it is, let’s not let it take away the play time of kids.

    Reply
  • If we’re doing ‘health problem’ barbie, why don’t we also do Obese Barbie, Alcoholic Barbie, Diabetic Barbie complete with accessories? Heck, we could have COPD Barbie with her own inhalers and portable oxygen cylinders.

    Reply
  • The world is gone mad. Everyone who has anything wrong with them want it to be considered ‘normal. Having cancer is an illness that is very serious and can have a very poor outcome. Very sad for those suffering and also for their families as I know only too well since our family lost two members in the recent past, one was a young mother. Children should not be burdened with all of this in their young lives – soon enough they will have to take on life’s problems and responsibilities. I doubt if such a doll would be bought by many people. Just imagine a child with a line up of ‘sick’ Barbies, one with an appendectomy scar, one with Parkinson’s, one with Type 2 diabetes and maybe a few with various disabilities and broken limbs!!!!

    Reply
  • I’d buy it for charity purposes to support the cause but I don’t think I’d give it too my 4 year old daughter to play with as she is too young to have to face this reality. Maybe if there is someone in your family going through chemo with its awful side effects it’s a good way to help a child. I lost my own mother to cancer when my daughter was a baby but maybe if she had of been older I would have considered buying

    Reply
  • this is a childrens TOY why oh why should a child have to worry about Cancer protect our children please do not introduce illness in their toys or games thank you

    Reply
  • Disgusting idea. This is a childs toy for gods sake. The people who came up with this idea should be ashamed of themselves. More education yes but dont shove it down their throats. Let them be children.

    Reply
  • I think this is not a good idea making money from such a serious issue what next wheel chair ken ? Blind barbie with a dog or cane amputee ken .
    While I support awareness support and highlighting of such matters this is a bridge too far and in bad taste

    Reply
    • Actually there are already plenty of toys representing people with a disability. Becky Barbie is in a wheelchair, Playmobil, Hasbro and Playskool also have figures with disabilities in their ranges. There are dolls with hearing aids, with crutches, with seeing eye dogs, and with wheelchairs.

      If a child with a disability wants to get a doll which they can relate to I really don’t see the problem in fact I think it’s an inclusive and positive thing for these companies to be involved in.

      Reply
  • Yes I cud accessorise with different head scarves !

    Reply
  • That’s a great idea, I wonder if Barbie is still as popular today though, the kids on the Late Late Toy Show have been a bit blasé over the last few years.

    Reply
  • I want to protect my kids from the reality of life for as long as possible. They have their whole adult lives to be worrying about that stuff without having them lying awake at night thinking about cancer. I think they should go back to the drawing board and find more useful ways to support cancer victims because this doesn’t help them one bit.

    Reply
  • It’s an absolute insult to cancer victims.

    Reply
  • Martina 11/01/12 #

    As ones would put it “how is barbie so popular is you have to buy her friends” its a good idea in theory but in practice

    Reply
  • mart_n 11/01/12 #

    “My leukocyte levels are high, and my Scandinavian ski-resort wardrobe add-on is loooow!”

    Reply
  • Why not! If it helps in some way to educate children about how other children living with cancer may be suffering and that going bald may be a side effect than it can only be a good thing.
    I’m sure the parents only want their own children not to be teased about the baldness and highlight it’s normality. ( for the want of a better word)

    Reply

Add New Comment